The Soapbox

Lazarus

Joined: 07/05/2002 Posts: 12174
Likes: 23079


Gorsuch likes to opine that he must go back to the original text & meaning


in order to interpret the Constitution.

How then does he devolve the 2d Amendment

"A well regulated Militia,"

to not be about a well regulated militia?

Each state had a militia when the amendment was written. How do the words not mean a militia in the originalist text, meaning and intent?

TIA

[Post edited by Lazarus at 03/24/2021 09:14AM]

Posted: 03/24/2021 at 09:13AM



+5

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  To me a state's national guard should be this militia -- Oregon Hoo 03/24/2021 11:02AM
  "Originalist" interpretation is a con game. ** -- DanTheFan 03/24/2021 10:36AM
  Dan, you are more succinct than I. Chapeau +1 ** -- Lazarus 03/24/2021 11:02AM
  It’s not like there is no room at all for interpretation. -- hoolstoptheheels 03/24/2021 10:19AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307